ADNO Seminar: Strengthening Justice and ADO Governance for the Future of Anti-Doping

The recent 20th Anniversary of Anti-Doping Norway was an opportunity to come together and envision the Future of Anti-Doping using the Guiding Principle as a compass.

The seminar focused on NADO Governance, particularly operational independence and athletes´ rights to justice in anti-doping.
Bjørn Berge (Deputy Secretary General of the Council of Europe) opened the event and explained the importance of the Guiding Principles for the Future of Anti-Doping from the perspective of the Council of Europe.

Find here the presentations of the Anniversary Seminar:

Michael Ask (ITA): The Future of Anti-Doping from the Sports Movement Perspective: Through the lenses of the ITA Dr. Zhan Hui (CHINADA): Provincial Anti-doping Organizations Play an Important Role in Pursue Clean Sport in China Arnout Geeraert (Universiteit Utrecht, Play the Game): Governance Observers and lessons learned for Anti-Doping Siobhán Leonard (Sport Ireland): NADGO – the National Experiences, lessons learned and how did they follow-up? Žaneta Csáderová (Slovak Anti-Doping Agency): NADGO – the National Experiences, lessons learned and how did they follow-up? Kim Højgaard Ravn (Anti-Doping Denmark): NADGO – the National Experiences, lessons learned and how did they follow-up? Allison Wagner (USADA): bringing in the voice of athletes and avoiding conflicts of interests Tom May (WADA): The possible need to strengthen WADAs Guide on the Operational Independence of NADOs Jorge Leyva (iNADO): Experiences from NADO governance for the broader anti-doping community Dr. Zhan Hui (CHINADA): Provincial Anti-doping Organizations Play an Important Role in Pursue Clean Sport in China Andrea Gotzmann (NADA Germany): My personal conclusions after almost 40 years in anti-doping: Where we have been and where you should go Anna Thorstenson (WADA’s Anti-Doping Ombuds): Athletes’ Due Process – which safeguards do we have in place, and what can be strengthened nationally within the current Code and globally in a future Code Revision Julien Attuil (CoE): What is needed in today’s set-up from a Human Rights Perspective? Niels Kiær (Anti-Doping Norway): Prosecution Committee – what is it, how does one ensure objectivity, human rights and good prosecution practices? José Luis Terreros Blanco & Carlos Gea (Spanish Commission for the Combat of Doping in Sport): Interplay between Criminal and Administrative Courts Jeremy Luke (Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport): Sport Disciplinary Resolution Council of Canada (SDRCC) Farhad Abasov (AMADA): Legal aid in Azerbaijan’s anti-doping system. Petteri Lindblom (FINCIS): Legal aid in the Finnish anti-doping system. Jeremy Roubin (AFLD): On the new powers of the French NADO